Intel HD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 620

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 620

Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 120 Watt
5.3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 6 GB

Processus de fabrication	14 nm versus 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 120 Watt
Taille de mémore maximale	32 GB versus 6 GB

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 300 MHz
Environ 63% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 1050 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 133.6 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s
53.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 24
10.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,275 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
8.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 versus 922
2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 versus 216
7.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 31098 versus 4178
4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 versus 24.275
6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 versus 227.879
5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 versus 1.508
Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.803 versus 15.582
16.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 versus 30.288
9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 versus 1404
2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 versus 1733
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3340
9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 versus 1404
2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 versus 1733
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3340
10.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 versus 343

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1506 MHz versus 300 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1708 MHz versus 1050 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	133.6 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1280 versus 24
Performance á point flottant	4,275 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	8160 versus 922
PassMark - G2D Mark	444 versus 216
Geekbench - OpenCL	31098 versus 4178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	111.55 versus 24.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1371.266 versus 227.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.49 versus 1.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.803 versus 15.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	509.222 versus 30.288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12645 versus 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3654 versus 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 versus 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12645 versus 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3654 versus 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 versus 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3677 versus 343

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

922

8160

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

216

444

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4178

31098

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

24.275

111.55

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

227.879

1371.266

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.508

8.49

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.582

19.803

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.288

509.222

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1404

12645

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1733

3654

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1404

12645

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1733

3654

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

3359

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

343

3677

Nom	Intel HD Graphics 620	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark	922	8160
PassMark - G2D Mark	216	444
Geekbench - OpenCL	4178	31098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.275	111.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	227.879	1371.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.508	8.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.582	19.803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	30.288	509.222
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1404	12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1733	3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1404	12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1733	3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340	3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	343	3677

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel HD Graphics 620	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Pascal
Nom de code	Kaby Lake GT2	GP106B
Date de sortie	30 August 2016	15 August 2016
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1334	385
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$237.11
Prix maintenant		$229.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		49.49
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz	1708 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	300 MHz	1506 MHz
Performance á point flottant	403.2 gflops	4,275 gflops
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	16 nm
Pipelines	24	1280
Taux de remplissage de la texture	25.2 GTexel / s	133.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	120 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	4,400 million
Noyaux CUDA		1280
Température maximale du GPU		94 °C
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Soutien de bus		PCIe 3.0
Taille du laptop		large
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	32 GB	6 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	192 Bit
Genre de mémoire	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	1	0
Bande passante de la mémoire		192 GB / s
Vitesse de mémoire		8008 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
Surround
Virtual Reality
VR Ready