Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 21.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1536 MB
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3320
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3320
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2016 vs 26 March 2010
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 1536 MB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 3320
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 3320

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

  • 2.3x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 42 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
  • 20x more pipelines: 480 vs 24
  • 3.3x better floating-point performance: 1,345.0 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
  • 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 vs 922
  • Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 216
  • 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13143 vs 4178
  • Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.483 vs 24.275
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 706.104 vs 227.879
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 vs 1.508
  • Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.405 vs 15.582
  • 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.875 vs 30.288
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 vs 1404
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3658 vs 1733
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 vs 1404
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3658 vs 1733
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 700 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate 42 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 480 vs 24
Floating-point performance 1,345.0 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4121 vs 922
PassMark - G2D Mark 430 vs 216
Geekbench - OpenCL 13143 vs 4178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 34.483 vs 24.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 706.104 vs 227.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.245 vs 1.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.405 vs 15.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 106.875 vs 30.288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5110 vs 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3658 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5110 vs 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3658 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
922
4121
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
216
430
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4178
13143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.275
34.483
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
227.879
706.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.508
4.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.582
30.405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30.288
106.875
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
5110
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
3658
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3320
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
5110
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
3658
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3320
Name Intel HD Graphics 620 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark 922 4121
PassMark - G2D Mark 216 430
Geekbench - OpenCL 4178 13143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.275 34.483
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 227.879 706.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.508 4.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.582 30.405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.288 106.875
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404 5110
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1733 3658
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 3320
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404 5110
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1733 3658
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 3320
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 343 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 620 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Fermi
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 GF100
Launch date 30 August 2016 26 March 2010
Place in performance rating 1334 742
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $499
Price now $71.99
Value for money (0-100) 61.35

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 700 MHz
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops 1,345.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 24 480
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s 42 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,100 million
CUDA cores 480
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support 16x PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
SLI options 2-way, 3-way
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin & 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 1536 MB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 177.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1848 MHz (3696 data rate)

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
SLI