Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA NVS 5100M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA NVS 5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 200
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 62
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2747
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2747
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 116.16 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 vs 200 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2747 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5100M
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6549 vs 4182
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6549 vs 4182 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA NVS 5100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 | 200 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 62 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4182 | 6549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 2747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 2747 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA NVS 5100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GT216 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1336 | 1493 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 116.16 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 8.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |