Intel HD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 vs 3802
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 9.69
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 1.004

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770

• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
• 33.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 24
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1262 vs 1114
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 vs 268
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 vs 312.246
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.748 vs 20.404
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 vs 32.567
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 vs 1859
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2279 vs 1945
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 vs 1859
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2279 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1114 1262
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 318
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4554 3802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 9.69
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 615.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 1.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 26.748
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 115.157
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2279
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2279
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3358

Compare specifications (specs)