Intel HD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 24.788

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

• 2.6x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1901 vs 1114
• Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 268
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9694 vs 4554
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.196 vs 312.246
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.619 vs 1.795
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 vs 20.404
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 32.567
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2809 vs 1859
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 1945
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2809 vs 1859
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1114 1901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 530
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4554 9694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 24.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 638.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 2.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 41.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 112.347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3358

Compare specifications (specs)