Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 10.8 billion / sec
• Around 71% better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 258.05 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 vs 478
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 91
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 vs 2171
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 4.85
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 vs 195.796
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 0.561
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 vs 9.109
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 vs 16.727
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 vs 960
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2701
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 vs 960
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2701

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

• Around 92% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 vs 1945
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1114 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 91
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4554 2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 2701

Compare specifications (specs)