Intel HD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 7 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 27.6 GTexel / s versus 10.8 billion / sec
- Environ 71% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 441.6 gflops versus 258.05 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 versus 478
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 versus 91
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 versus 2171
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 versus 4.85
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 versus 195.796
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 versus 0.561
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 versus 9.109
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 versus 16.727
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 versus 960
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 2701
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 versus 960
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 2701
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 5 January 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s versus 10.8 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops versus 258.05 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 versus 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 versus 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 versus 2171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 versus 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 versus 195.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 versus 0.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 versus 9.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 versus 16.727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 versus 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 versus 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 2701 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- Environ 92% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 672 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 24
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 versus 1945
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 versus 1945
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 versus 24 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2210 versus 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2210 versus 1945 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 2171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 195.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 0.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 9.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 16.727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 2701 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 5 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1216 | 1503 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 672 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 258.05 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 10.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |