Intel Arc A750 vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and AMD Radeon R7 250E videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 21000x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
- 7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 24.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 21.562
- 10.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6333.285 vs 582.073
- 17x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 2.2
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.823 vs 38.669
- 20.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 98.052
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 vs 20 December 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s vs 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 512 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 vs 21.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 vs 582.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 vs 2.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 vs 38.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 vs 98.052 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250E
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A750 | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 | 0 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | 21.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 | 582.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 | 2.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 | 38.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 | 98.052 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A750 | AMD Radeon R7 250E | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | DG2-512 | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 20 December 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 78 | 1046 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 2050 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 268.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21700 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc A750 with others
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
IntelArc A750 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
