Intel Arc A750 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and AMD Radeon RX 6800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 539
- Around 17% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2612 vs 2238
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98254 vs 87735
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 vs 539 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 vs 2238 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 vs 87735 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 2050 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13277 vs 12373
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 12 Oct 2022 |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 2050 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13277 vs 12373 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A750 | AMD Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | 539 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 | 13277 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 | 2238 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 | 87735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A750 | AMD Radeon RX 6800M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | DG2-512 | Navi 22 |
| Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 78 | 83 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2050 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 268.8 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21700 million | 17200 million |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
