Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- Around 72% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 8045.5x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 650
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12373 vs 6332
- 8.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2612 vs 305
- 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98254 vs 20732
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 75.758
- 7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6333.285 vs 843.503
- 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 5.071
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.823 vs 24.676
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 301.168
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 vs 25 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 vs 650 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 vs 6332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 vs 305 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 vs 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 vs 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 vs 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 vs 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 vs 301.168 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | 650 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 | 6332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 | 305 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
Code name | DG2-512 | GP107 |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 78 | 487 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 268.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |