Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1346 vs 462
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 175
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2485
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2485

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX

• Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1346 462
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	340 175
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 2485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 2485

Compare specifications (specs)