Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon HD 6790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 4 April 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6790
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 840 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16.7x more pipelines: 800 vs 48
- Around 52% better floating-point performance: 1,344.0 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1619 vs 1575
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3127 vs 2652
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3127 vs 2652
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3534 vs 1564
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3534 vs 1564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 840 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,344.0 gflops vs 883 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1619 vs 1575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3127 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3127 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3534 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3534 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1575 | 1619 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 | 373 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7072 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3350 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.318 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.234 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.768 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.423 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Barts |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 4 April 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 857 | 862 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $64.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 39.40 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,344.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 800 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,700 million |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
