Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 9 October 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- Around 61% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2528 vs 1594
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 362
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7973 vs 7093
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 2652
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1564
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1564
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2528 vs 1594 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 vs 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7973 vs 7093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 1564 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1594 | 2528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 411 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7093 | 7973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3335 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK106 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 9 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 873 | 876 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 928 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,425 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |