Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD FirePro W4170M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD FirePro W4170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1726 vs 1049
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 359 vs 211
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7343 vs 6460
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 15.502
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 2689
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 2689
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 28 April 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1726 vs 1049 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 vs 211 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7343 vs 6460 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 vs 15.502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 2689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 2689 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2802 vs 1884
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2802 vs 1884
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 vs 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 vs 1884 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4170M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD FirePro W4170M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1726 | 1049 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 211 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7343 | 6460 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 15.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 2689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 2689 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD FirePro W4170M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | Mars |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 28 April 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1043 | 1046 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
Powerplay |