Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and ATI Radeon X800 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 48 Watt
- 26.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 65
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 190
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 1 May 2004 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 48 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 vs 65 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 190 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 PRO
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 475 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Radeon X800 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 65 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 190 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Radeon X800 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | R400 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | R423 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 1 May 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1044 | 913 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 48 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 160 million |
Texture fill rate | 5.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz |