Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 20.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 84
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 628
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 628

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 360 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 363

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1739 84
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	363 385
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 628

Compare specifications (specs)