Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2536 vs 988
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2536 vs 988
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 314
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1596 vs 630
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 vs 3210
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 3 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 vs 988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 314 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1596 vs 630 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 vs 3210 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1586
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1586
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 2418
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 2418
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 vs 2418 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 2808 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 314 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1596 | 630 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 3 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 736 | 1359 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 392 million |
Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | |
Pipelines | 20 | |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |