Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 620 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 349
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 28 June 2011 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 349 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2664 vs 2536
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2664 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3626 vs 1586
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3626 vs 1586
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3318 vs 2418
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3318 vs 2418
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2074 vs 1626
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6389 vs 5885
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2664 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2664 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3626 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3626 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3318 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3318 vs 2418 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2074 vs 1626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6389 vs 5885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 | 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 | 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 | 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 | 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 3318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 3318 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 349 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1626 | 2074 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5885 | 6389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.415 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 690.98 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.702 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.215 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GF114 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 28 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 724 | 921 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 620 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |