Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon R7 360
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon R7 360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 1047.6x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 38.068
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.292 vs 819.203
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.572 vs 3.386
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.728 vs 58.285
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 193.589 vs 188.858
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 4799
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 4799
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.292 vs 819.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.572 vs 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.728 vs 58.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.589 vs 188.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 4799 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3138 vs 2680
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 377
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16200 vs 12010
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3708
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3708
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3138 vs 2680 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 377 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 vs 12010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 3708 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon R7 360 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2680 | 3138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12010 | 16200 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.292 | 819.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.572 | 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.728 | 58.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.589 | 188.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon R7 360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Tobago |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 624 | 627 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $146.65 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 768 | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |