Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus AMD Radeon R7 360
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon R7 360 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 50.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 6.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.809 versus 38.068
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.453 versus 819.203
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 versus 3.386
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 versus 58.285
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 versus 188.858
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 4799
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 4799
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.809 versus 38.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.453 versus 819.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 versus 3.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 versus 58.285 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 versus 188.858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 versus 4799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 versus 4799 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 360
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3140 versus 2672
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 versus 380
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16200 versus 11996
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 versus 3708
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 versus 3708
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3140 versus 2672 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 versus 380 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 versus 11996 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 versus 3708 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2672 | 3140 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11996 | 16200 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.809 | 38.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.453 | 819.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 3.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 58.285 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 188.858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 4799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 4147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 4799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 4147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon R7 360 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Tobago |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 18 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 625 | 628 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $146.65 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 768 | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 165 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon R7 360
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
