Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon R9 M385X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 857.1x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2687 vs 1994
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 354 vs 267
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 4079
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 4079
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 vs 1994 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 vs 267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 4079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 4079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3707 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385X
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49760 vs 12204
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 49760 vs 12204 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M385X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 | 1994 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | 267 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12204 | 49760 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 4079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 4079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon R9 M385X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Strato |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 622 | 563 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Compute units | 48 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
