Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 1394.6x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 11610
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 33.507
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 1037.305
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 3.064
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 52.533
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 140.911
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 4485
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 940
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2158
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 4485
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 940
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 vs 11610 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 33.507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 vs 1037.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 vs 3.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 vs 52.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 vs 140.911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2158 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 2666
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 383
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 2666 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 383 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 2690 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 476 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 11610 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 33.507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 1037.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 3.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 52.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 140.911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2158 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Lexa |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 594 | 876 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Price now | $75 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1183 MHz |
| Compute units | 48 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
