Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon RX 550 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 37.86 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 versus 11610
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 33.507
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 versus 1037.305
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 versus 3.064
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 versus 52.533
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 versus 140.911
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 4485
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 940
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 2158
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 4485
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 940
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 2158
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 18 April 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 versus 11610 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 33.507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 versus 1037.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 versus 3.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 versus 52.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 versus 140.911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 versus 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 versus 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 2158 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- 3.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1183 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 versus 2666
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 383
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 versus 2666 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 383 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 2690 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 476 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 11610 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 33.507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 1037.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 3.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 52.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 140.911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2158 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Lexa |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 876 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Prix maintenant | $75 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1183 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
