Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 8250x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 120
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 9.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 283
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 371
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1701
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 28 June 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 120 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 vs 283 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1701 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 283 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1701 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | RV630 |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 28 June 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 594 | 646 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Compute units | 48 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 390 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 35.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR4 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIANVS 810
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
