Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 5076.9x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 1180
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 5083
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 2095
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3285
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 2095
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 40 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 vs 1180 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 vs 5083 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 383
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 vs 383 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 1180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 390 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 5083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 594 | 661 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 22 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 392 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |