Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 1552.9x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 34.0 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
- 14.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 11089
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 27.93
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 980.005
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 3.268
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 47.309
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 97.852
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 3873
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3614
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3317
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 3873
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3614
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3317
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 26 March 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 34.0 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 vs 11089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 27.93 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 vs 980.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 vs 3.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 vs 47.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 vs 97.852 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 3873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 3873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3317 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 448 vs 384
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3134 vs 2666
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 414 vs 383
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 448 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3134 vs 2666 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 vs 383 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 3134 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 414 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 11089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 27.93 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 980.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 3.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 47.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 97.852 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 3873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 3873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3317 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | GF100 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 26 March 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 594 | 790 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $522.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 34.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 215 Watt |
CUDA cores | 448 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 133.9 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |