Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1033 MHz
842.1x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 62.7 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
8.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 134 Watt
Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 9482
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 25.21
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 561.43
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 2.026
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 30.868
3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 51.009
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 3426
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3642
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3242
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 3426
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3642
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3242

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Sep 2020 vs 26 March 2013
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz vs 1033 MHz
Texture fill rate	52.80 GTexel/s vs 62.7 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 134 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	11991 vs 9482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	79.859 vs 25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1137.615 vs 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.569 vs 2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	61.688 vs 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	192.566 vs 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5609 vs 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708 vs 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5609 vs 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708 vs 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3242

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 2666
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 383

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3388 vs 2666
PassMark - G2D Mark	465 vs 383

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2666

3388

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

383

465

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11991

9482

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

79.859

25.21

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1137.615

561.43

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.569

2.026

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

61.688

30.868

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

192.566

51.009

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5609

3426

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3642

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3242

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5609

3426

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3642

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3242

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
PassMark - G3D Mark	2666	3388
PassMark - G2D Mark	383	465
Geekbench - OpenCL	11991	9482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	79.859	25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1137.615	561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.569	2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	61.688	30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	192.566	51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5609	3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708	3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5609	3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708	3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3242
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1106

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.0	Kepler
Code name	Tiger Lake GT1	GK106
Launch date	2 Sep 2020	26 March 2013
Place in performance rating	594	810
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$169
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1033 MHz
Compute units	48
Core clock speed	300 MHz	980 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	211.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1.690 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	844.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	768
Pixel fill rate	13.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	52.80 GTexel/s	62.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	134 Watt
CUDA cores		768
Floating-point performance		1,585 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Transistor count		2,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		9.5" (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		One 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width		192 Bit
Memory clock speed		6.0 GB/s
Memory type		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA