Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 515.1x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 102.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 41.613
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 971.208
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 4.281
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 40.404
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 86.208
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3686
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3686
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 10 May 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 102.5 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 41.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 vs 971.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 vs 4.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 vs 40.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 vs 86.208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3686 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 2666
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 383
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 vs 11991
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 5609
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 5609
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 2666 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 383 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 vs 11991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 5345 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 537 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 15511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 41.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 971.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 4.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 40.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 86.208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | GK104 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 10 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 594 | 554 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $474.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 980 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256-bit GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |