Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- 561.1x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 94.1 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 37.505
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1138.276 vs 864.402
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.596 vs 3.09
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.742 vs 40.457
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 193.829 vs 84.186
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 94.1 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 vs 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 vs 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 vs 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 vs 84.186 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4790 vs 2687
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 353
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14223 vs 12203
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 5609
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 5609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4790 vs 2687 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 353 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14223 vs 12203 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 | 4790 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 | 527 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12203 | 14223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1663 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 25 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 622 | 588 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $249.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Compute units | 48 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
