Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 94.1 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 11.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 170 Watt
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 37.505
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1138.276 versus 864.402
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.596 versus 3.09
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.742 versus 40.457
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 193.829 versus 84.186
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 25 June 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 94.1 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 versus 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 versus 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 versus 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 versus 84.186 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 3.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 384
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4792 versus 2687
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 versus 354
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14219 versus 12203
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 versus 5609
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 versus 5609
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4792 versus 2687 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 versus 354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14219 versus 12203 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 | 4792 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | 527 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12203 | 14219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1664 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 25 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 621 | 590 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Prix maintenant | $249.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,378 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 500 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
