Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA Quadro P620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 1134x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 43.877
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 773.248
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 3.082
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 53.425
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 184.343
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 3575
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 3575

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• 4.2x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 2666
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 383
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 11991
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3708
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3356
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3708
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2666 3670
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	383 549
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11991 12475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.859 43.877
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137.615 773.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.569 3.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.688 53.425
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	192.566 184.343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 6631
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 6631

Compare specifications (specs)