Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and AMD Radeon R7 265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 30x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 150 Watt
Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 13 February 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 265
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 85.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 12
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 12 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 265
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon R7 265 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 13 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1624 | 1708 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 1024 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |