Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs Intel HD Graphics 610

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Intel HD Graphics 610 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 464
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 845
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 464
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 845
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 December 2017 vs 30 August 2016
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1000 vs 464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1701 vs 845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1000 vs 464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1701 vs 845

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610

  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 318
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 vs 92
  • 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2443 vs 1004
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1017 vs 476
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1017 vs 476
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 693 vs 318
PassMark - G2D Mark 155 vs 92
Geekbench - OpenCL 2443 vs 1004
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1017 vs 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1017 vs 476

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 610

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
318
693
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
92
155
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1004
2443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
476
1017
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1000
464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1701
845
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
476
1017
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1000
464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1701
845
Name Intel UHD Graphics 600 Intel HD Graphics 610
PassMark - G3D Mark 318 693
PassMark - G2D Mark 92 155
Geekbench - OpenCL 1004 2443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 56.77
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 6.882
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 476 1017
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1000 464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1701 845
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 476 1017
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1000 464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1701 845
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 600 Intel HD Graphics 610

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Generation 9.5
Code name Gemini Lake GT1 Kaby Lake GT1
Launch date 11 December 2017 30 August 2016
Place in performance rating 1624 1531
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 750 MHz 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 12 12
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt 5 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 189 million
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops
Texture fill rate 26.4 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR4 / LPDDR4 DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory 1 1
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB

Technologies

Quick Sync