Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus Intel HD Graphics 610
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Intel HD Graphics 610 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 versus 464
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 versus 845
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 versus 464
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 versus 845
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 30 August 2016 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 versus 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 versus 845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 versus 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 versus 845 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 610
- Environ 50% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 300 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 750 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 versus 318
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 versus 92
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2443 versus 1004
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1017 versus 476
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1017 versus 476
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 750 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 versus 318 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 versus 92 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2443 versus 1004 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 versus 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 versus 476 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 610
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 693 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 155 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 2443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 845 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics 610 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | Kaby Lake GT1 |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 30 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1624 | 1531 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 12 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 422.4 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 26.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||

