Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs Intel UHD Graphics 605

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Intel UHD Graphics 605 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 vs 4.247
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 56.77 vs 52.728
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.427 vs 0.312
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.876 vs 3.355
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.882 vs 4.219

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605

• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 750 MHz
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 18 vs 12
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 369 vs 318
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 106 vs 92
• Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1458 vs 1004
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 vs 476
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 vs 1000
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 vs 1701
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 vs 476
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 vs 1000
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 vs 1701

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 605

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	318 369
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	92 106
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1004 1458
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.952 4.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.77 52.728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.427 0.312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.876 3.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.882 4.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 724
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 1643
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1961
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 724
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 1643
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1961

Compare specifications (specs)