Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus Intel UHD Graphics 605

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Intel UHD Graphics 605 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 600

versus

Intel UHD Graphics 605

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600

Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 versus 4.247
Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 56.77 versus 52.728
Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.427 versus 0.312
Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.876 versus 3.355
Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.882 versus 4.219

Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.952 versus 4.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	56.77 versus 52.728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.427 versus 0.312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.876 versus 3.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	6.882 versus 4.219

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 605

Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 800 MHz versus 750 MHz
Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 18 versus 12
Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 369 versus 318
Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 106 versus 92
Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1458 versus 1004
Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 versus 476
Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 versus 1000
Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 versus 1701
Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 versus 476
Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 versus 1000
Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 versus 1701

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	800 MHz versus 750 MHz
Pipelines	18 versus 12
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	369 versus 318
PassMark - G2D Mark	106 versus 92
Geekbench - OpenCL	1458 versus 1004
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	724 versus 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1643 versus 1000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1961 versus 1701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	724 versus 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1643 versus 1000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1961 versus 1701

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 605

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

318

369

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

106

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1004

1458

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.952

4.247

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

56.77

52.728

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.427

0.312

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.876

3.355

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.882

4.219

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

476

724

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1000

1643

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1701

1961

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

476

724

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1000

1643

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1701

1961

Nom	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Intel UHD Graphics 605
PassMark - G3D Mark	318	369
PassMark - G2D Mark	92	106
Geekbench - OpenCL	1004	1458
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.952	4.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	56.77	52.728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.427	0.312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.876	3.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	6.882	4.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	476	724
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1000	1643
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1701	1961
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	476	724
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1000	1643
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1701	1961
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Intel UHD Graphics 605
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Generation 9.5
Nom de code	Gemini Lake GT1	Gemini Lake GT1
Date de sortie	11 December 2017	11 December 2017
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1624	1550
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	750 MHz	800 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	200 MHz	200 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	12	18
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt	5 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	189 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x1
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Genre de mémoire	DDR4 / LPDDR4	DDR4 / LPDDR4
Mémoire partagé	1	1
Technologies
Quick Sync