Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 19.2x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 96 Watt
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 47
- 16.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.529 vs 0.465
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 127
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 21 February 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 96 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 vs 47 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.529 vs 0.465 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 vs 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- 8.1x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 64 vs 12
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 487 vs 322
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 1701
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 1701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 64 vs 12 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 487 vs 322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3161 vs 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3161 vs 1701 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | 487 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 47 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.529 | 0.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.815 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.495 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.178 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 11.584 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 3161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 3161 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
| Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | G94 |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 21 February 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1611 | 1586 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 64 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 96 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 208 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 600 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6150
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8200
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7340
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330 IGP
