Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 15x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 75 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• 6.8x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 99% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 750 MHz
• 53.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 12
• 14x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 vs 318
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 92
• 17.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 1004
• 11.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 5.952
• 14.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 56.77
• 10.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 0.427
• 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 vs 5.876
• 32.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 6.882
• 15.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 476
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 1000
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1701
• 15.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 476
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 1000
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1701

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	318 4463
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	92 292
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1004 17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.952 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.77 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.427 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.876 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.882 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 3359

Compare specifications (specs)