Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 28.4x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 142 Watt
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 318 vs 101
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 92 vs 78
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 1 April 2004 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 142 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 vs 101 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 vs 78 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 375 MHz vs 200 MHz
Core clock speed | 375 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 101 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 78 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Curie |
Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | NV40 A1 |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 1 April 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1624 | 1496 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 375 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 142 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 222 million |
Texture fill rate | 4.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.0 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |