Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 13 January 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 709
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 vs 175
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3414 vs 2691
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1261 vs 1071
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1261 vs 1071
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1926 vs 1241
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1926 vs 1241
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2569 vs 1699
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2569 vs 1699
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 778 vs 709 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 vs 175 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3414 vs 2691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1261 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1261 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1926 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1926 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2569 vs 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2569 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 | 778 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | 233 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2691 | 3414 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 2569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 2569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.306 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.707 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.855 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.423 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.158 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | GF106 |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 13 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1341 | 1338 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $46.56 | |
Price now | $46.56 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,170 million |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 |