Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs AMD Radeon R6 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Radeon R6 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 1603.1x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 15.72 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 734 vs 618
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 182 vs 139
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.422 vs 11.201
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.277 vs 0.942
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1256 vs 860
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1256 vs 860

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R6 Graphics

• Around 78% higher core clock speed: 533 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 503.0 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4077 vs 3220
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 224.132 vs 221.42
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.267 vs 12.269
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 45.165 vs 18.909
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1784 vs 1720
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3182 vs 1772
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1784 vs 1720
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3182 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R6 Graphics

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	734 618
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	182 139
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3220 4077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.422 11.201
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	221.42 224.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.277 0.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.269 19.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.909 45.165
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 860
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1784
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 3182
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 860
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1784
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 3182

Compare specifications (specs)