Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD FirePro W4100

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD FirePro W4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 15.65
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 1.631
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 1620
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 1620

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 630 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1504 vs 1042
• Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 453 vs 241
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5447 vs 4592
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 vs 273.504
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 vs 19.939
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.309 vs 31.881
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1397
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 vs 878
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1397
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 vs 878

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 1504
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 453
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 5447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 15.65
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 538.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 1.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 31.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 75.309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1620
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1620

Compare specifications (specs)