Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon 535 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1024 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 189

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2017 vs 18 April 2017
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1024 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	241 vs 189

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1062 vs 1042
Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6091 vs 4592
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2343 vs 1397
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2405 vs 878
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2227
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2343 vs 1397
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2405 vs 878
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2227

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	730 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	384 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1062 vs 1042
Geekbench - OpenCL	6091 vs 4592
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2343 vs 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2405 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2343 vs 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2405 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 2227

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1042

1062

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

241

189

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4592

6091

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1397

2343

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

878

2405

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

3346

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1397

2343

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

878

2405

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

3346

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 620	AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark	1042	1062
PassMark - G2D Mark	241	189
Geekbench - OpenCL	4592	6091
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1397	2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	878	2405
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2227	3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1397	2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	878	2405
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2227	3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	62

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 620	AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 3.0
Code name	Kaby Lake GT2	Topaz
Launch date	1 September 2017	18 April 2017
Place in performance rating	1380	982
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		Radeon 500 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1024 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	730 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	24	384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	834 M
Compute units		6
Floating-point performance		784.1 gflops
Pixel fill rate		8.20 GP/s
Render output units		8
Stream Processors		384
Texture fill rate		24.60 GTexel/s
Texture Units		24
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	64 bit
Memory type	LPDDR3 / DDR4	GDDR5
Shared memory	1
Memory bandwidth		48 GB/s
Memory clock speed		4500 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support