Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R5 M255 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 940 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1043 vs 534
• Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 246 vs 135
• Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4568 vs 4491
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 14.288
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 166.596
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.988

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M255

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.164 vs 19.939
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.631 vs 31.881
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1459 vs 1397
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1715 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2227
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1459 vs 1397
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1715 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2227

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M255

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1043 534
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	246 135
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4568 4491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 14.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 166.596
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 0.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 20.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 66.631
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1459
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1459
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3357

Compare specifications (specs)