Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs ATI Radeon HD 3200

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and ATI Radeon HD 3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
• 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
• 12.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 82
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 227
• 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 386
• 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 386

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3200

• Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 40 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 82
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 227
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 386
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 386

Compare specifications (specs)