Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 995
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 4397
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 19.781
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 30.177
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 1045
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 1045

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 32 GB
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 241
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 27.062
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 273.504
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.777
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2227
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2227
• 6.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 995
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 254
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 4397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 30.177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 384

Compare specifications (specs)