Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 3 January 2017 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1608 vs 1042
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 241
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7151 vs 4592
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2652 vs 1397
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1564 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2227
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2652 vs 1397
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1564 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2227
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1608 vs 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 vs 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7151 vs 4592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2227 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 1608 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 358 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 7151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 3 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1380 | 862 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |