Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 3 January 2017 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- 2x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 24
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1608 versus 1042
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 versus 241
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7151 versus 4592
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2652 versus 1397
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1564 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 2227
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2652 versus 1397
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1564 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 2227
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 48 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1608 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 versus 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7151 versus 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 2227 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 1608 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 7151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 3 January 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 862 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 883 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
