Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 151
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 22.848
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 162.594
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 1.237

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1096 vs 1042
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5771 vs 4592
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 vs 19.939
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 vs 31.881
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1397
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 878
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 vs 2227
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1397
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 878
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 vs 2227
• 8.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 503 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 1096
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 151
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 5771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 95.545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3191
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 503

Compare specifications (specs)