Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 570
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 116
• Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 2363
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 4.651
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 213.211
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.624
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 10.521
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 23.978
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 1056
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 1352
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 1056
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 1352

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 740 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 vs 878
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 vs 878

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 570
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 116
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 2363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 4.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 213.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 0.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 10.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 23.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1352

Compare specifications (specs)